Forum comments in chronological order
Disclaimer: I am not responsible for what people (other than myself) write in the forums. Please report any abuse, such as insults, slander, spam and illegal material, and I will take appropriate actions. Don't feed the trolls.
Jag tar inget ansvar för det som skrivs i forumet, förutom mina egna inlägg. Vänligen rapportera alla inlägg som bryter mot reglerna, så ska jag se vad jag kan göra. Som regelbrott räknas till exempel förolämpningar, förtal, spam och olagligt material. Mata inte trålarna.
- Jun 2007
- Aug 2007
- Oct 2007
- Nov 2007
- Dec 2007
- Jan 2008
- Feb 2008
- Mar 2008
- Apr 2008
- May 2008
- Jun 2008
- Jul 2008
- Aug 2008
- Sep 2008
- Oct 2008
- Nov 2008
- Dec 2008
- Jan 2009
- Feb 2009
- Mar 2009
- Apr 2009
- May 2009
- Jun 2009
- Jul 2009
- Aug 2009
- Sep 2009
- Oct 2009
- Nov 2009
- Dec 2009
- Jan 2010
- Feb 2010
- Mar 2010
- Apr 2010
- May 2010
- Jun 2010
- Jul 2010
- Aug 2010
- Sep 2010
- Oct 2010
- Nov 2010
- Dec 2010
- Jan 2011
- Feb 2011
- Mar 2011
- Apr 2011
- May 2011
- Jun 2011
- Jul 2011
- Aug 2011
- Sep 2011
- Oct 2011
- Nov 2011
- Dec 2011
- Jan 2012
- Feb 2012
- Mar 2012
- Apr 2012
- May 2012
- Jun 2012
- Jul 2012
- Aug 2012
- Sep 2012
- Oct 2012
- Nov 2012
- Dec 2012
- Jan 2013
- Feb 2013
- Mar 2013
- Apr 2013
- May 2013
- Jun 2013
- Jul 2013
- Aug 2013
- Sep 2013
- Oct 2013
- Nov 2013
- Dec 2013
- Jan 2014
- Feb 2014
- Mar 2014
- Apr 2014
- May 2014
- Jun 2014
- Jul 2014
- Aug 2014
- Sep 2014
- Oct 2014
- Nov 2014
- Dec 2014
- Jan 2015
- Feb 2015
- Mar 2015
- Apr 2015
- May 2015
- Jun 2015
- Jul 2015
- Aug 2015
- Sep 2015
- Oct 2015
- Nov 2015
- Dec 2015
- Jan 2016
- Feb 2016
- Mar 2016
- Apr 2016
- May 2016
- Jun 2016
- Jul 2016
- Aug 2016
- Sep 2016
- Oct 2016
- Nov 2016
- Dec 2016
- Jan 2017
- Feb 2017
- Mar 2017
- Apr 2017
- May 2017
- Jun 2017
- Jul 2017
- Aug 2017
- Sep 2017
- Oct 2017
- Nov 2017
- Dec 2017
- Jan 2018
- Feb 2018
- Mar 2018
- Apr 2018
- May 2018
- Jun 2018
- Jul 2018
- Aug 2018
- Sep 2018
- Oct 2018
- Nov 2018
- Dec 2018
- Jan 2019
- Feb 2019
- Mar 2019
- Apr 2019
- May 2019
- Jun 2019
- Jul 2019
- Aug 2019
- Sep 2019
- Oct 2019
- Nov 2019
- Dec 2019
- Jan 2020
- Feb 2020
- Mar 2020
- Apr 2020
- May 2020
- Jun 2020
- Jul 2020
- Aug 2020
- Sep 2020
- Oct 2020
- Nov 2020
- Dec 2020
- Jan 2021
- Feb 2021
- Mar 2021
- Apr 2021
- May 2021
- Jun 2021
- Jul 2021
- Aug 2021
- Sep 2021
- Oct 2021
- Nov 2021
- Dec 2021
- Jan 2022
- Feb 2022
- Mar 2022
- Apr 2022
- May 2022
- Jun 2022
- Jul 2022
- Aug 2022
- Sep 2022
- Oct 2022
- Nov 2022
- Dec 2022
- Jan 2023
- Feb 2023
- Mar 2023
- Apr 2023
- May 2023
- Jun 2023
- Jul 2023
- Aug 2023
- Sep 2023
- Oct 2023
- Nov 2023
- Dec 2023
- Jan 2024
- Feb 2024
- Mar 2024
- Apr 2024
- May 2024
- Jun 2024
- Jul 2024
- Aug 2024
- Sep 2024
- Oct 2024
- Nov 2024
Dec 2016
Anonymous
Sat 3-Dec-2016 21:19
Sat 3-Dec-2016 21:19
Very cool and addictive, would love to see the source! I may need to listen to the Zelda theme, but for the life of me, I can't figure this one out: http://www.linusakesson.net/games/autosokoban/?v=1&seed=2084139227&level=10
Linus, your site is my new homepage!
Cheers,
falk
Linus, your site is my new homepage!
Cheers,
falk
Anonymous
Sat 3-Dec-2016 21:47
Sat 3-Dec-2016 21:47
Very cool and addictive, would love to see the source! I may need to listen to the Zelda theme, but for the life of me, I can't figure this one out: http://www.linusakesson.net/games/autosokoban/?v=1&seed=2084139227&level=10
Linus, your site is my new homepage!
Cheers,
falk
Linus, your site is my new homepage!
Cheers,
falk
nm, got it with the help of my wife. For an engineer, I really suck at puzzles!
Anonymous
Mon 5-Dec-2016 03:20
Mon 5-Dec-2016 03:20
How much would it cost to have you build me one?
I'll build you one for $15,000. :-P
With shipping to the US? If so, I'm in.
Anonymous
Mon 5-Dec-2016 03:25
Mon 5-Dec-2016 03:25
Are you willing to release a binary for the 88?
Anonymous
Sun 11-Dec-2016 23:47
Sun 11-Dec-2016 23:47
I have a small question.
Can you tell me when the /dev/ttyXXX or /dev/pts/X are added in the /dev directory ?
Initially, I thought that each program had its own /dev/ttyXXX device. When is the kernel adding a new /dev/ttyXXX device ?
Let say that I add the following lines in /etc/rc.local
# Start these program during the init.
/home/user/prog1 &
/home/user/prog2 &
/home/user/prog3 &
Will it create one or three new /dev/ttyXXX device ?
(or will it reuse another one that is already present?)
Thanks for this article.
Can you tell me when the /dev/ttyXXX or /dev/pts/X are added in the /dev directory ?
Initially, I thought that each program had its own /dev/ttyXXX device. When is the kernel adding a new /dev/ttyXXX device ?
Let say that I add the following lines in /etc/rc.local
# Start these program during the init.
/home/user/prog1 &
/home/user/prog2 &
/home/user/prog3 &
Will it create one or three new /dev/ttyXXX device ?
(or will it reuse another one that is already present?)
Thanks for this article.
Anonymous
Sat 17-Dec-2016 13:43
Sat 17-Dec-2016 13:43
Отлично чувачек :)
Anonymous
Sun 18-Dec-2016 14:10
Sun 18-Dec-2016 14:10
+++++ +++++ [->++ +++++ +++<] >++.+ +++++ .<+++ [->-- -<]>- -.+++ +++.<
++++[ ->+++ +<]>+ +++.< +++++ +++[- >---- ----< ]>--- --.+. ----- -.<++
+++++ [->++ +++++ <]>++ ++.-- --.<+ +++++ [->-- ----< ]>--- ----- .----
--.++ +++++ +.<++ +[->- --<]> --.++ +++.+ +++.- .<+++ +++[- >++++ ++<]>
+++++ +++.< +++++ ++[-> ----- --<]> ---.+ +++++ +.+++ ++.-- ----- .<+++
++++[ ->+++ ++++< ]>+++ .<+++ ++++[ ->--- ----< ]>--- ----- .<+++ ++++[
->+++ ++++< ]>+++ .<+++ ++++[ ->--- ----< ]>.++ ++.-- -.--- -.<++ +++++
[->++ +++++ <]>++ ++.<+ +++++ [->-- ----< ]>--- ----- ---.- --.<+ +++++
+[->+ +++++ +<]>+ ..<++ ++++[ ->--- ---<] >---- --.-- -.+.+ ++.-- ---.+
++++. ----- ----. <++++ ++++[ ->+++ +++++ <]>++ +++++ +++++ +.<
<!----><!--]--><!--+++--><!--]-->
++++[ ->+++ +<]>+ +++.< +++++ +++[- >---- ----< ]>--- --.+. ----- -.<++
+++++ [->++ +++++ <]>++ ++.-- --.<+ +++++ [->-- ----< ]>--- ----- .----
--.++ +++++ +.<++ +[->- --<]> --.++ +++.+ +++.- .<+++ +++[- >++++ ++<]>
+++++ +++.< +++++ ++[-> ----- --<]> ---.+ +++++ +.+++ ++.-- ----- .<+++
++++[ ->+++ ++++< ]>+++ .<+++ ++++[ ->--- ----< ]>--- ----- .<+++ ++++[
->+++ ++++< ]>+++ .<+++ ++++[ ->--- ----< ]>.++ ++.-- -.--- -.<++ +++++
[->++ +++++ <]>++ ++.<+ +++++ [->-- ----< ]>--- ----- ---.- --.<+ +++++
+[->+ +++++ +<]>+ ..<++ ++++[ ->--- ---<] >---- --.-- -.+.+ ++.-- ---.+
++++. ----- ----. <++++ ++++[ ->+++ +++++ <]>++ +++++ +++++ +.<
<!----><!--]--><!--+++--><!--]-->
Massively Interleaved Sprite Crunch
Anonymous
Tue 20-Dec-2016 09:42
Tue 20-Dec-2016 09:42
Very clever, and thanks for the interesting read!
Greetings from Daniel (Pernod)
Greetings from Daniel (Pernod)
Anonymous
Wed 21-Dec-2016 11:00
Wed 21-Dec-2016 11:00
Very interesting read! I wish there were more of such clear in-depth articles explaining these tricks. That's a clever and elegant solution to encode the crunch schedule into the sprite.
Btw, ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x15) | ((MC & MCBASE) & 0x2a) can be simplified to (MC | MCBASE) & 0x3f, can't it? Is it known what's happening in the hardware when this value is generated?
Btw, ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x15) | ((MC & MCBASE) & 0x2a) can be simplified to (MC | MCBASE) & 0x3f, can't it? Is it known what's happening in the hardware when this value is generated?
lft
Linus Åkesson
Wed 21-Dec-2016 12:30
Linus Åkesson
Wed 21-Dec-2016 12:30
Btw, ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x15) | ((MC & MCBASE) & 0x2a) can be simplified to (MC | MCBASE) & 0x3f, can't it?
No, the proposed simplification would compute bitwise-or between all the bits. The original expression computes bitwise-and for odd-numbered bits, bitwise-or for even-numbered bits.
Is it known what's happening in the hardware when this value is generated?
I have a pretty good guess: Every other bit is inverted in the internal representation. This is sometimes done when implementing registers that have to be incremented quickly, and MC does have to be incremented on three succesive half-cycles. So what *really* happens is a bitwise-and across the entire value, and this is a typical artefact of NMOS logic.
Anonymous
Wed 21-Dec-2016 16:34
Wed 21-Dec-2016 16:34
lft wrote:
Btw, ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x15) | ((MC & MCBASE) & 0x2a) can be simplified to (MC | MCBASE) & 0x3f, can't it?
No, the proposed simplification would compute bitwise-or between all the bits. The original expression computes bitwise-and for odd-numbered bits, bitwise-or for even-numbered bits.
Oops, that was dumb. I read the article yesterday, but this morning I thought it was ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x15) | ((MC | MCBASE) & 0x2a), that is, MC | MCBASE twice. I should not post before morning coffee :-)
Anonymous
Sat 24-Dec-2016 00:58
Sat 24-Dec-2016 00:58
This is really fantastic
Anonymous
Sat 24-Dec-2016 07:21
Sat 24-Dec-2016 07:21
Hi
Do you know if they will work with z8 files?. It would be cool to play current IF games on the C64. Thanks.
--KMBR
Do you know if they will work with z8 files?. It would be cool to play current IF games on the C64. Thanks.
--KMBR
A case against syntax highlighting
Anonymous
Sat 24-Dec-2016 12:45
Sat 24-Dec-2016 12:45
In your Alice example, you have used the wrong syntax colour for the word White.
Massively Interleaved Sprite Crunch
ralph
Ralph Corderoy
Wed 28-Dec-2016 19:27
Ralph Corderoy
Wed 28-Dec-2016 19:27
lft wrote:
Every other bit is inverted in the internal representation. This is sometimes done when implementing registers that have to be incremented quicklyIs this to speed the carry ripple? Have you a name for this technique so I can Google, or a reference?