Fratres
Fratres by Arvo Pärt is one of my favourite pieces of music. The analytical meets the aesthetical as Pärt takes us on a meditative, harmonical journey, built up from a simple set of mathematical rules.
Many people who listen to Fratres find it repetitive or even boring at first. After a while, though, they start to unconsciously recognize some of the patterns in the music. In a sense, they develop an intuitive feeling for what comes next in the sequence. Then, if they are the inquisitive, puzzle-solving type of person, they will try to understand the patterns rationally as well. This gradual awakening, whether intended by the composer or not, is perhaps what fascinates me most about Fratres.
I have interpreted Fratres in the form of a dual SID tune.
- Linus Åkesson - Fratres (Arvo Pärt) - Dual SID (MP3, 15.0 MB)
- Fratres DualSID (SID, 7.3 kB)
If you downloaded the SID file, note that there are two subtunes. The first subtune uses arpeggios to play the tune on a single SID chip, whereas the second one (recommended) addresses two SID chips (at $d400 and $d500). To play the dual SID version with sidplay2, include -fd -o2 on the command line.
“The complex and many-faceted only confuses me, and I must search for unity. What is it, this one thing, and how do I find my way to it? Traces of this perfect thing appear in many guises — and everything that is unimportant falls away.”
— Arvo Pärt
The algorithm
Warning! Spoilers ahead. If you enjoy solving puzzles, you may wish to search for these patterns yourself. In any case, I strongly recommend you to listen to the entire piece at least once before reading on.
Have you listened to it now? Good.
Structure
The overall structure of Fratres is simple: Vertically, the piece is divided into two drones (an A and an E that last throughout the piece), three moving voices (low, middle and high) and some percussion (claves and bass drum). Horizontally, ten refuges separate nine segments. Each segment contains a series of chords arranged in some kind of harmonic progression. Between each pair of segments, a recurring, harmonically empty percussion motif — the refuge — offers a moment of contemplation before the next chord sequence.
The following picture illustrates the refuges and segments as a (terribly long) pedestrian crossing. Each segment can be further divided into two halves: The first half consists of falling chords, and the second half consists of rising chords.
Within each segment half, three voices combine to play a sequence of chords. Each sequence consists of eight different chords played in three different orders (let's call them bars). They are: 1, 2, 7, 8 — 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 — 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. For instance, in the first half of the first segment, the eight chords are: (C#, A, E), (Bb, E, D), (A, E, C#), (G, C, Bb), (F, C, A), (E, C, G), (D, C, F) and (C#, A, E). Thus, in the first bar we get: (C#, A, E), (Bb, E, D), (D, C, F), (C#, A, E).
In order to understand the algorithm behind Fratres, we just need to figure out how to form the eight chords that build up each segment half. That is what the remainder of this article will focus on.
Tintinnabuli
Fratres is composed in the tintinnabuli style invented by Pärt. This basically means that some voices are restricted to playing notes from a particular triad (in Fratres this is the A minor triad), while other voices play melodies.
The drones, A and E, are obviously only playing notes from the A minor triad. The middle voice in the chords is also restricted in this way, so it will only ever play A, C or E in some octave.
The high and low voices, however, play notes from the harmonic D minor scale. Note how the C sharp in the D minor scale contrasts with the C natural in the triad.
The low and high voices
Start with a harmonic D minor scale. Write it out as a circle, like this:
The low voice starts at C#. The high voice starts at E (and is transposed one octave further up). For the eight falling chords (the chords that build up the first half of the first segment), each voice simply moves around the circle, counter-clockwise, until it completes a full revolution at the eighth chord. For the rising chords, we do the same procedure clockwise.
Much like the international date line in the pacific ocean, we add a seam, where the notes get transposed one octave. This will ensure that we end up where we started. To achieve symmetry, this is done when we've come exactly half the way around the circle, i.e. between chords 4 and 5.
The middle voice
As mentioned, the middle voice will only play notes from the A minor triad. Furthermore, the middle voice will by definition play in between the other two voices. But these constraints alone will not be enough to guide the middle voice, so instead we devise a new circle containing the three possible notes:
We want the middle voice to sync up to the low and high voices after one complete revolution. Alas, three doesn't divide seven, so we're forced to have some sort of assymmetry in this circle. Pärt has resorted to using four consecutive C:s, as can be seen in the lower left part of our circle.
Why four consecutive C:s? We can only speculate, but my personal theory is this: The ethereal, timeless sound of this whole piece is partly due to the fact that it lingers somewhere in between A minor and A major. This delicate balance is maintained using the C natural from the triad and the C sharp from the melodic voices. By choosing to duplicate the C in the middle voice circle, one prevents the piece from tilting too far towards A major.
All right, but why not double the other C group, the one in the upper right part of the circle? That's easy. If we did that, then the middle voice would end up playing C natural at the same time as another voice would be playing C sharp. That would be too dissonant.
Just like the low and high voices, the middle voice traverses the circle counter-clockwise during the first half of a segment, and clockwise during the second half. Both these journeys begin at the indicated note, e.g. the top A for segment one. But this circle contains fourteen notes rather than seven, so the middle voice does not play its own retrograde in the second half like the low and high voices do.
Spinning the wheels
To get the low, middle and high voices for the following segments, we simply move each starting point two steps around the circle, in the counter-clockwise direction. The following diagrams show the starting points for the falling and rising halves of segment number two.
Second segment, falling half: | Second segment, rising half: |
---|---|
This rotation, two steps at a time, continues for the entire set of nine segments. Thus, segments 1 and 8 will be identical, as will segments 2 and 9.
And that is how you extract beautiful, complex harmonic content out of a simple formula.
Posted Monday 3-Dec-2007 06:52
Discuss this page
Disclaimer: I am not responsible for what people (other than myself) write in the forums. Please report any abuse, such as insults, slander, spam and illegal material, and I will take appropriate actions. Don't feed the trolls.
Jag tar inget ansvar för det som skrivs i forumet, förutom mina egna inlägg. Vänligen rapportera alla inlägg som bryter mot reglerna, så ska jag se vad jag kan göra. Som regelbrott räknas till exempel förolämpningar, förtal, spam och olagligt material. Mata inte trålarna.
Edgar
Fri 21-Dec-2007 06:35
Mon 28-Apr-2008 05:14
Anonymous
Linus Åkesson
Mon 28-Apr-2008 16:38
Anonymous
The word "simple" has many connotations. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect.
Wed 30-Apr-2008 15:15
Anonymous poster
lft wrote:
Anonymous
The word "simple" has many connotations. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect.
Wed 8-Oct-2008 02:08
Sat 20-Dec-2008 02:24
Best to all,
karl@freefriends.org
Fri 9-Jan-2009 18:41
Thu 5-Feb-2009 22:13
Best to all,
karl@freefriends.org
Fratres means brethren (or brothers). Hence when priests or ministers get together it is called a Fraternity (now that we have women priests it should be a Maternity!)
The pulses on the claves/percussion is a Renaiassance call to attention/prayer that the monks (or brothers) would have played using wooden semantra - which prefigured the use of bells in the Eastern Church)
Thu 16-Jul-2009 19:44
I hear it in a concert at Lent. It goes very deep into heart if you hear it in a church...
Do you know something about the religious sense? Why "Fratres" = "brothers"?
Linus Åkesson
Sun 19-Jul-2009 18:04
No, not as such. I know that Pärt was longing for spiritualism in a country where religion was more or less outlawed by the communist regime. This has, I think, clearly affected the music, and probably the title, although I'm not aware of any specific symbolism.
Wed 14-Oct-2009 04:44
You are completely awesome.
Now just complete the arpeggios :)
Tue 27-Oct-2009 08:17
Now I want to find out all the other versions of this piece of music. Especially one for a wind octet & percussion.
--jartur
Thu 19-Nov-2009 00:42
Linus Åkesson
Thu 26-Nov-2009 15:53
No, because a passacaglia has a repeating sequence of notes in some voice (usually the bass), to which the other voices add variation. Fratres has a strictly repetitive high-level form, but the actual note sequences change from one cycle to the next, so it doesn't fit the definition of a passacaglia.
John Tippin
Sat 12-Dec-2009 23:13
Mon 14-Dec-2009 20:10
Wed 27-Jan-2010 12:38
Thu 25-Feb-2010 14:47
I came here as a result of this thread on reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/classicalmusic/comments/b5yd4/piece_of_classical_music_needs_identifying/
Fri 26-Feb-2010 01:22
Linus Åkesson
Thu 18-Mar-2010 20:16
Oh, I just haven't got around to it. But I like the HVSC, and will try to find the time to distribute my sids through it.
Sun 11-Apr-2010 23:01
Sat 11-Sep-2010 14:23
Does anyone know the reason for Pärt to write the piece? I'll be playing it in a concert and would like to include this information in my programme notes.
Thanks
Mon 8-Nov-2010 18:27
Best to all,
karl@freefriends.org
Fratres means brethren (or brothers). Hence when priests or ministers get together it is called a Fraternity (now that we have women priests it should be a Maternity!)
The pulses on the claves/percussion is a Renaiassance call to attention/prayer that the monks (or brothers) would have played using wooden semantra - which prefigured the use of bells in the Eastern Church)
Tue 14-Dec-2010 21:27
Thank you all.
Sat 25-Dec-2010 22:47
Lukas from Prague
Linus Åkesson
Mon 17-Jan-2011 16:06
Lukas from Prague
Thank you!
Sun 13-Mar-2011 23:34
Fri 22-Apr-2011 06:51
I think that the "circular" step-wise motion is an effect, not a cause. I believe that the voices move that way due to the smooth, scalar voice-leading that Part chose; but I do not believe that Part was thinking in the way that you describe: which is to say that the music can certainly be diagrammed in the manner that you describe, but that I do not believe that Part had this scheme in his head when he composed the piece. Certainly, there is a harmonic additive process being employed. But I think that he was thinking in harmony, melody, and voice-leading.
Of course, I don't know that for a fact, and again I don't mean to criticize your analysis--only to point out that perhaps Part was thinking in "math," from which you have distilled an interesting "equation."
Fri 24-Jun-2011 16:41
K'plah
Mon 1-Aug-2011 11:58
Mon 22-Aug-2011 15:48
Mon 27-Feb-2012 04:59
Forgive my tardiness. Having found this explanation of Fratres on Google (thank you Mr. Kesson for such a thorough analysis!), I set out to intabulate it. It works perfectly without transposition. Please email me at ninebreaker21@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy of my intabulation.
Sat 21-Apr-2012 05:33
Sun 2-Sep-2012 01:57
a in the usa
Tue 30-Oct-2012 10:35
Best to all,
karl@freefriends.org
Fratres means brethren (or brothers). Hence when priests or ministers get together it is called a Fraternity (now that we have women priests it should be a Maternity!)
The pulses on the claves/percussion is a Renaiassance call to attention/prayer that the monks (or brothers) would have played using wooden semantra - which prefigured the use of bells in the Eastern Church)
No, sorry, it would be sorority - not maternity!
Sat 4-May-2013 21:16
Fri 31-Jan-2014 18:30
Btw: anyone happen to have a MIDI file of the arrangement (yes, i'm being lazy ;)
Mon 8-Dec-2014 13:12
Sat 28-Mar-2015 16:15
Sun 24-Jul-2016 09:11
I'm not particularly interested in SIDs or in classical music rendered with computers or anything, but you have created something really special here.
Reading the comments once again I just realized that I agree with Lukas from Prague's statement about how this particular 8 bit sound suits this music so well that it has become (his second and) my favorite version. Someone else, I believe, is saying that the synthetic timbres match the "unworldly chord progressions", well, that is just exactly how I feel about it.
I hope Lukas from Prague doesn't read this last sentence about how my former favorite version was the one for male voices and cellos by the Schola Gregoriana Pragensis.
Anyway, to put it in one word: thanks.
J Canters
Fri 21-Oct-2016 14:29
Sat 11-Feb-2017 14:13
Whose version is this?
Mon 12-Jun-2017 15:13
Actually Pärt was born in Paide, Estonia and was raised in Rakvere in northern Estonia.
Mon 5-Aug-2019 00:57
Although A-C sounds correct, A-A is what is happening. The chord in question (beat 3 of bar 4) is {D, A, F, E}. A video with the sheet music can be found here, the chord is at 0:45 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNVoZVFpW58
Wed 11-Jan-2023 14:54
Are the low and high voices being playing by the violin while the middle voice is beeing playing by the piano?