Forum comments in chronological order
Disclaimer: I am not responsible for what people (other than myself) write in the forums. Please report any abuse, such as insults, slander, spam and illegal material, and I will take appropriate actions. Don't feed the trolls.
Jag tar inget ansvar för det som skrivs i forumet, förutom mina egna inlägg. Vänligen rapportera alla inlägg som bryter mot reglerna, så ska jag se vad jag kan göra. Som regelbrott räknas till exempel förolämpningar, förtal, spam och olagligt material. Mata inte trålarna.
- Jun 2007
- Aug 2007
- Oct 2007
- Nov 2007
- Dec 2007
- Jan 2008
- Feb 2008
- Mar 2008
- Apr 2008
- May 2008
- Jun 2008
- Jul 2008
- Aug 2008
- Sep 2008
- Oct 2008
- Nov 2008
- Dec 2008
- Jan 2009
- Feb 2009
- Mar 2009
- Apr 2009
- May 2009
- Jun 2009
- Jul 2009
- Aug 2009
- Sep 2009
- Oct 2009
- Nov 2009
- Dec 2009
- Jan 2010
- Feb 2010
- Mar 2010
- Apr 2010
- May 2010
- Jun 2010
- Jul 2010
- Aug 2010
- Sep 2010
- Oct 2010
- Nov 2010
- Dec 2010
- Jan 2011
- Feb 2011
- Mar 2011
- Apr 2011
- May 2011
- Jun 2011
- Jul 2011
- Aug 2011
- Sep 2011
- Oct 2011
- Nov 2011
- Dec 2011
- Jan 2012
- Feb 2012
- Mar 2012
- Apr 2012
- May 2012
- Jun 2012
- Jul 2012
- Aug 2012
- Sep 2012
- Oct 2012
- Nov 2012
- Dec 2012
- Jan 2013
- Feb 2013
- Mar 2013
- Apr 2013
- May 2013
- Jun 2013
- Jul 2013
- Aug 2013
- Sep 2013
- Oct 2013
- Nov 2013
- Dec 2013
- Jan 2014
- Feb 2014
- Mar 2014
- Apr 2014
- May 2014
- Jun 2014
- Jul 2014
- Aug 2014
- Sep 2014
- Oct 2014
- Nov 2014
- Dec 2014
- Jan 2015
- Feb 2015
- Mar 2015
- Apr 2015
- May 2015
- Jun 2015
- Jul 2015
- Aug 2015
- Sep 2015
- Oct 2015
- Nov 2015
- Dec 2015
- Jan 2016
- Feb 2016
- Mar 2016
- Apr 2016
- May 2016
- Jun 2016
- Jul 2016
- Aug 2016
- Sep 2016
- Oct 2016
- Nov 2016
- Dec 2016
- Jan 2017
- Feb 2017
- Mar 2017
- Apr 2017
- May 2017
- Jun 2017
- Jul 2017
- Aug 2017
- Sep 2017
- Oct 2017
- Nov 2017
- Dec 2017
- Jan 2018
- Feb 2018
- Mar 2018
- Apr 2018
- May 2018
- Jun 2018
- Jul 2018
- Aug 2018
- Sep 2018
- Oct 2018
- Nov 2018
- Dec 2018
- Jan 2019
- Feb 2019
- Mar 2019
- Apr 2019
- May 2019
- Jun 2019
- Jul 2019
- Aug 2019
- Sep 2019
- Oct 2019
- Nov 2019
- Dec 2019
- Jan 2020
- Feb 2020
- Mar 2020
- Apr 2020
- May 2020
- Jun 2020
- Jul 2020
- Aug 2020
- Sep 2020
- Oct 2020
- Nov 2020
- Dec 2020
- Jan 2021
Apr 2008
Anonymous
Tue 1-Apr-2008 16:38
Tue 1-Apr-2008 16:38
Wow that is amazing.
Would using 2 or 3 chips like this produce even more impressive results?
I notice there is some horizontal jitter in the lava field section, between 1:42 and 2:02.
I guess you are running short on the time needed to do the calculations accurately.
Would using 2 or 3 chips like this produce even more impressive results?
I notice there is some horizontal jitter in the lava field section, between 1:42 and 2:02.
I guess you are running short on the time needed to do the calculations accurately.
Anonymous
Tue 1-Apr-2008 23:28
Tue 1-Apr-2008 23:28
beautiful work!
Anonymous
Thu 3-Apr-2008 11:40
Thu 3-Apr-2008 11:40
At University of Gent (molecular genetics department), we weigh the plants to determine if they need water. This way we can water them very precisely and there's no milliliter of water given to much or to little.
-femeref
-femeref
Anonymous
Sat 5-Apr-2008 01:43
Sat 5-Apr-2008 01:43
just heard your paralax for piano and entered your hp through www.remix64.com . anyway, I think you should release another piano-istic remix. I saw your last release is from 2001! I bet some ppl in the "scene" would appreciate another tune like that.
cheers,
cpt_chaos
www.cpt-chaos.de.vu
cheers,
cpt_chaos
www.cpt-chaos.de.vu
A case against syntax highlighting
Anonymous
Sun 6-Apr-2008 18:29
Sun 6-Apr-2008 18:29
I think you have a case for a lot of languages, but one interesting case is that of LateX - without syntax highlighting you really have to stare at the screen to see if you've written \subsection{} which is an operator, or subsection{}, which the typesetter will parse as normal text. By the way, I know that LateX is not a programming language, but I feel it's relevant.
Anonymous
Mon 7-Apr-2008 07:57
Mon 7-Apr-2008 07:57
Nice job you did. I will study the work you made and try to learn from it. Iĺl put a post on my blog about it as soon as possible.
Jeronimo, from Brazil
www.blogdoje.com.br
Jeronimo, from Brazil
www.blogdoje.com.br
Anonymous
Mon 7-Apr-2008 12:32
Mon 7-Apr-2008 12:32
Great Job, impressive!
One small hint for prototyping boards. The vertical "bridges" are looking a bit messy (i know, its a prototype).
Before using silver wire: Unroll 1 Meter of wire, attach it to a fixed object, grab the other end (with a gripper) and pull it hardly. Now you have very straight silver wire which looks quite nice :)
Thx for the idea of gluing the layout onto the board, i will give it a try....
kiu
One small hint for prototyping boards. The vertical "bridges" are looking a bit messy (i know, its a prototype).
Before using silver wire: Unroll 1 Meter of wire, attach it to a fixed object, grab the other end (with a gripper) and pull it hardly. Now you have very straight silver wire which looks quite nice :)
Thx for the idea of gluing the layout onto the board, i will give it a try....
kiu
Anonymous
Wed 9-Apr-2008 17:47
Wed 9-Apr-2008 17:47
One interesting thing missing in the schematics is a suitable value for the capacitor.
Anonymous
Wed 9-Apr-2008 17:56
Wed 9-Apr-2008 17:56
The amount of current would be very small. And the time it flows can be minimized by providing 5V on the sensing side when not measuring resistance, in effect giving very ner zero volts of difference between the electrodes.
Electrolysis would happen to a very small extent, but it can be minimized in the same way as the current.
Time to put that gold jewelry to use! It won't dissolve if used as electrodes.
The magnetic field would probably not be strong enough to be measurable with affordable instruments, given the small current.
Electrolysis would happen to a very small extent, but it can be minimized in the same way as the current.
Time to put that gold jewelry to use! It won't dissolve if used as electrodes.
The magnetic field would probably not be strong enough to be measurable with affordable instruments, given the small current.
Anonymous
Wed 9-Apr-2008 18:43
Wed 9-Apr-2008 18:43
You forgot to mention Hallucinogen. ;)
Anonymous
Wed 9-Apr-2008 18:51
Wed 9-Apr-2008 18:51
You must be older than 115 to get the knowledge you have and such composition skills?...
Mucho respect!
Mucho respect!
Anonymous
Thu 10-Apr-2008 13:42
Thu 10-Apr-2008 13:42
Plants tend to grow, thus gain weight. How do you calculate the amount of plant growth?
-webpresence04 at soulsurf se
-webpresence04 at soulsurf se
At University of Gent (molecular genetics department), we weigh the plants to determine if they need water. This way we can water them very precisely and there's no milliliter of water given to much or to little.
-femeref
-femeref
lft
Linus Åkesson
Thu 10-Apr-2008 22:25
Linus Åkesson
Thu 10-Apr-2008 22:25
One interesting thing missing in the schematics is a suitable value for the capacitor.
Good point. I'm using a 10 uF electrolytic capacitor.
Anonymous
Fri 11-Apr-2008 00:44
Fri 11-Apr-2008 00:44
Very great work. Absolut great demo and hardware... Big greetings, Chainsaw. (www.chainsaw72.ch.vu)
Anonymous
Mon 14-Apr-2008 23:35
Mon 14-Apr-2008 23:35
lft wrote:
10 uF electrolytic capacitor
Thanks!
Anonymous
Tue 15-Apr-2008 03:59
Tue 15-Apr-2008 03:59
could I buy one? I have this science project due in 4 weeks. I just want it done!!!
Autoscatto
autoscatto
Wed 16-Apr-2008 10:51
autoscatto
Wed 16-Apr-2008 10:51
Hola! I`m working (for now copying =]) on your project but i have problems... What kind of diode do you use in this board?
Thanks for your good work!!! (and excuse my bad english)
Thanks for your good work!!! (and excuse my bad english)
lft
Linus Åkesson
Wed 16-Apr-2008 18:39
Linus Åkesson
Wed 16-Apr-2008 18:39
Autoscatto wrote:
Hola! I'm working (for now copying =]) on your project but i have problems... What kind of diode do you use in this board?Thanks for your good work!!! (and excuse my bad english)
Glad you like it! =) I'm using 1N4148 diodes, but anything with a forward drop somewhere around 0.7 V should work.
Anonymous
Mon 21-Apr-2008 11:25
Mon 21-Apr-2008 11:25
A fantastic solution to the problem, when the experts wanted a brute-force approach! Congratulations!
Anonymous
Wed 23-Apr-2008 10:46
Wed 23-Apr-2008 10:46
Really impressive. I'll be showing this to friends at KTH (kth.se), and probably build one or two. On my main lab board I have an AT90USB chip, which has to run at 16MHz to support USB, so I'd guess that means lower horizontal resolution. I think an Xmega could be really impressive, using its DMA engine to output high resolution colour signals.
-- Yann Vernier / LoneTech
-- Yann Vernier / LoneTech
Anonymous
Fri 25-Apr-2008 14:18
Fri 25-Apr-2008 14:18
can i use this as a project for college?
i mean, could u tell me what i need to build it?
like the components?
i mean, could u tell me what i need to build it?
like the components?
Anonymous
Mon 28-Apr-2008 02:53
Mon 28-Apr-2008 02:53
You should compose some nice tunes for it and share them :)
Anonymous
Mon 28-Apr-2008 07:14
Mon 28-Apr-2008 07:14
I am completely amazed by Fratres and am listening to all the versions on my online music service as the piece is new to me. I see it is also your favorite piece. But when I looked it up on Wiki the text citing your analysis seemed a little dismissive of the piece where it says: "The chord sequences themselves follow a clear pattern, and while the progressing chords explore a rich harmonic space, they nevertheless appear to have been generated by means of a simple mathematical formula." Were you saying that the piece is somehow simple or mechanically created? Just wondering, your thoughts appreciated.
Anonymous
Anonymous
lft
Linus Åkesson
Mon 28-Apr-2008 18:38
Linus Åkesson
Mon 28-Apr-2008 18:38
I am completely amazed by Fratres and am listening to all the versions on my online music service as the piece is new to me. I see it is also your favorite piece. But when I looked it up on Wiki the text citing your analysis seemed a little dismissive of the piece where it says: "The chord sequences themselves follow a clear pattern, and while the progressing chords explore a rich harmonic space, they nevertheless appear to have been generated by means of a simple mathematical formula." Were you saying that the piece is somehow simple or mechanically created? Just wondering, your thoughts appreciated.
Anonymous
Anonymous
The word "simple" has many connotations. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect.
Anonymous
Tue 29-Apr-2008 12:48
Tue 29-Apr-2008 12:48
hi, it says:
"couldn't load RAM image"
<large path lol>\ZSTRANDZ.83p
(Access denied, Java socketpermission etc.)
By the way, your craft demo rocks!
"couldn't load RAM image"
<large path lol>\ZSTRANDZ.83p
(Access denied, Java socketpermission etc.)
By the way, your craft demo rocks!
lft
Linus Åkesson
Tue 29-Apr-2008 12:56
Linus Åkesson
Tue 29-Apr-2008 12:56
Oops. Will fix. =)
Anonymous
Wed 30-Apr-2008 08:24
Wed 30-Apr-2008 08:24
I am amazed and impressed. Bit-banging VGA and using the SPI port as a video shifter is too clever... wow. Does Atmel know about this demo of yours?
Anonymous
Wed 30-Apr-2008 17:15
Wed 30-Apr-2008 17:15
Thank you for your kind response; it helps me understand this amazing music.
Anonymous poster
The word "simple" has many connotations. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect.
Anonymous poster
lft wrote:
I am completely amazed by Fratres and am listening to all the versions on my online music service as the piece is new to me. I see it is also your favorite piece. But when I looked it up on Wiki the text citing your analysis seemed a little dismissive of the piece where it says: "The chord sequences themselves follow a clear pattern, and while the progressing chords explore a rich harmonic space, they nevertheless appear to have been generated by means of a simple mathematical formula." Were you saying that the piece is somehow simple or mechanically created? Just wondering, your thoughts appreciated.
Anonymous
Anonymous
The word "simple" has many connotations. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect.