(hide navigation)
  • Swedish content
Fund my projects
Patreon
Steady
Don't miss
Page thumbnail
Pushing Onwards: Return of the Chipophone
Forum
Register
Log in
Latest comments
Syndication
RSS feed
Feedback
Music downloads
Chip music
Cover picture
01. BWV 565 - Toccata and Fugue in D minor8:55
02. BWV 639 - Ich ruf' zu dir2:42
03. BWV 1080.1 - Contrapunctus 13:56
04. BWV 662 - Allein Gott6:45
05. BWV 582 - Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor17:50

About the music

01. Toccata and Fugue in D minor

Two 6581 chips.

The toccata is perhaps the most well-known work in the entire organ repertoire. Like many toccatas, it is probably a transcribed improvisation. It has been postulated that this was a test tune that Bach would play when trying out new organs. That would explain its crude character and the various hops between heavy chords and rapid melodic parts.

The fugue is written for four voices, and the subject resembles a passage in the toccata.

02. Ich ruf' zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ

One 6581 chip.

This is a chorale prelude from Orgelbüchlein. The chorale itself is a very simple melody, so the praxis is to embellish it with trills and other ornaments. Thus, my interpretation will be different from other recordings you may have heard.

This piece of music was featured in Tarkovsky's film Solaris.

03. Contrapunctus 1 from Die Kunst der Fuge

Two 8580 chips.

Die Kunst der Fuge is a terribly clever suite of fourteen fugues and four canons, of increasing complexity, all based on the same theme. This is the first piece in the suite, so it is a comparatively simple four-part fugue.

04. Allein Gott in der Höh' sei Ehr'

Two 6581 chips.

Bach has based at least ten different works on this melody (BWV numbers 662, 663, 664, 675, 676, 677, 711, 715, 716, 717), presumably quite varying in style and harmonic content. This version is a chorale prelude.

05. Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor

Two 8580 chips.

The grand finale!

A passacaglia is based on a short melody which is repeated throughout the piece, mostly in the bass, sometimes with variations. In classical music, this type of prolonged repetition of a single theme is called an ostinato. In contemporary music, it's not called anything at all, because it is implied.

The fugue is quite advanced. The subject is the first half of the ostinato from the passacaglia. Everytime the subject sounds, two counter-subjects can also be heard (except in the very beginning of the fugue), while the fourth voice joins the others in free counterpoint. These four roles — playing the subject, playing the first counter-subject, playing the second counter-subject and playing free counterpoint — can be distributed among the four voices in 24 different permutations. This happens eleven times throughout the fugue, and Bach picks a different permutation every time according to a mathematical formula. Can you find it?

About the technology

It struck me that, at least in theory, organ pipes should generate quite primitive sound waves. If so, how come a church organ doesn't sound like a chip tune, which is also built up from simple waveforms? Well, actually it will, if you remove the church. And if you connect a Commodore 64 home computer to a loudspeaker in a large hall, it will sound like an organ.

So the music on this album is not performed on a pipe organ. Instead, what you hear is the sound of one or two SID chips (controlled by a Commodore 64), enhanced by a convolution reverb to simulate church acoustics.

Quantization

There is already an abundance of SID tunes based on sheet music, in particular by J. S. Bach. The problem is that all those SID tunes are terrible. Apparently, people have merely typed in the notes from the sheet music. This leads to quantized timing (where e.g. every quarter note lasts exactly 500 milliseconds, always), and while quantized timing may be perfectly fine for modern genres, it simply won't do for classical music.

The goal is not to play the right notes in the right order; that's the starting point. Then you have to adjust the timing of every single note, listening and re-listening, making sure that it doesn't sound mechanical. You have to add movement, energy, and emphasis (which, on an organ, has to be implemented by varying the duration of the notes, and the pauses between them, because there's no dynamic response). You need fermatas and ornaments. You have to realize that some jumps cannot be performed unless the organist lifts his hand, and so on, and so forth.

This album is an attempt to demonstrate that classical music can indeed be performed by a computer. But the amount of work that goes into programming the computer will never be less than the work that a traditional performer would put into studying the same piece of music.

Registration

In general, I've opted for fixed-width pulse waves for the manual voices, and a pulse hard-synced with a triangle wave one octave below for the pedal voice. Some waveforms are run through a combined low-pass and band-pass filter with moderate resonance. In Allein Gott and Ich ruf zu dir, I use a narrow pulse wave for the cantus firmi and unfiltered triangle waves for the accompaniment.

Posted Saturday 10-May-2008 07:27

Discuss this page

Disclaimer: I am not responsible for what people (other than myself) write in the forums. Please report any abuse, such as insults, slander, spam and illegal material, and I will take appropriate actions. Don't feed the trolls.

Jag tar inget ansvar för det som skrivs i forumet, förutom mina egna inlägg. Vänligen rapportera alla inlägg som bryter mot reglerna, så ska jag se vad jag kan göra. Som regelbrott räknas till exempel förolämpningar, förtal, spam och olagligt material. Mata inte trålarna.

Anonymous
Thu 17-Jul-2008 04:32
This is amazing. Congrats on your work.
Anonymous
Sun 20-Jul-2008 19:09
Can't wait to see this performed live!
Anonymous
Wed 23-Jul-2008 09:46
Haha. En cyborgel! :)

Riktigt coolt.
Anonymous
Wed 30-Jul-2008 02:40
Great, Great, Great. Congratulations for this.
Anonymous
Mon 4-Aug-2008 00:12
Helt fantastisk rättvisa åt musiken, undras om man kan få låna domkyrkan en natt för att uppnå perfekt rumstemporal spridning och spela in alltsammans där? Linus Walleij
Anonymous
Sat 9-Aug-2008 12:01
Mycket bra genomfört! Jag har spelat de flesta av dessa verken på just kyrkorgel, och håller kanske inte med om all interpretation, men det är ju givetvis personligt. Ljudet är fantastiskt bra! /F. Segerfalk aka Moppe
Anonymous
Thu 11-Sep-2008 09:21
I find it unfortunate that you didn’t also put up unprocessed files – that would have been extremely interesting.

Still though, this is really awesome. Thanks for sharing.

—ap
Anonymous
Fri 12-Sep-2008 00:11
I'm assuming this uses modern equal temperament? [half step up = x * 2^(1/12) ]

You should experiment with some temperaments that were popular during Bach's time.

-Andy
Anonymous
Fri 12-Sep-2008 11:03
> Well, actually it will, if you remove the church.

I'm still laughing at this :-)

The result is impressive. Thanks man.

Pygy
Anonymous
Sat 13-Sep-2008 02:33
This is lovely. Thank you very much for sharing. Of course I too would like to play with the original files, but I'm glad you've seen fit to share even the MP3s. Do we have a license to copy them around as well?
Anonymous
Sat 13-Sep-2008 02:56
This is lovely. Thank you very much for sharing. Of course I too would like to play with the original files, but I'm glad you've seen fit to share even the MP3s. Do we have a license to copy them around as well?

Oops, forgot to sign that — I'm Kragen Javier Sitaker, kragen@canonical.org.
lft
Linus Åkesson
Tue 16-Sep-2008 20:04
I'm assuming this uses modern equal temperament? [half step up = x * 2^(1/12) ]

You should experiment with some temperaments that were popular during Bach's time.

-Andy

That's an excellent suggestion. Thanks!
lft
Linus Åkesson
Tue 16-Sep-2008 20:06
This is lovely. Thank you very much for sharing. Of course I too would like to play with the original files, but I'm glad you've seen fit to share even the MP3s. Do we have a license to copy them around as well?

Oops, forgot to sign that — I'm Kragen Javier Sitaker, kragen@canonical.org.

Yes, do copy them around. Sharing is caring.
Anonymous
Mon 20-Oct-2008 21:39
This is most impressive, great work!
-- Jonas Norberg
Anonymous
Mon 13-Apr-2009 20:08
Great idea and great interpretation :)
Anonymous
Mon 13-Apr-2009 20:49
shocking.
Anonymous
Sun 25-Jul-2010 17:42
impressive indeed, I hope you'll do some equivalent played LIVE with your chippophone (and with either the spring-reverb box put back in.. or a real church around) :)

-barzoule
Anonymous
Fri 6-Aug-2010 22:03
Wow. Just wow. This will go together just great with the Wendy Carlos stuff and the Brad Smith 8-bit version of "Dark Side of the Moon" I've been listening to recently. Also loved your YouTube clips featuring the Chipophone. Keep it up, Linus. The world needs nerds like you! :D

Ben, from Germany
Anonymous
Thu 23-Sep-2010 22:37
Promise me that one day you will demonstrate this live. I might even learn Swedish and fly to Sweden to witness it. I am in awe.....
Anonymous
Thu 23-Sep-2010 22:41
Thinking about it, the one part of the acoustics of the organ you're missing is that every pipe is in a different location, so affected differently by the room.

Theoretically speaking, if you were to try it live, you could have seperate amplification for each chip, split into bands using several band-pass filters, and then individual speakers each representing a bundle of related pipes.

But I'm thinking too much now, amn't I?
lft
Linus Åkesson
Fri 8-Oct-2010 07:25
Thinking about it, the one part of the acoustics of the organ you're missing is that every pipe is in a different location, so affected differently by the room.

Theoretically speaking, if you were to try it live, you could have seperate amplification for each chip, split into bands using several band-pass filters, and then individual speakers each representing a bundle of related pipes.

But I'm thinking too much now, amn't I?

How can thinking too much ever be a problem? =)
Anonymous
Thu 29-Nov-2012 20:44
I just recently found this ( Via the Chipophone, again, of course ) and I must say that it's a very well done reinterpretion, especially compared to the Midi versions I have heard so far, which appear to be directly transcribed notes without much else.

//D.S.
Alex-BK
Mon 6-Nov-2017 12:35
Cool! But sounds more like 60's Farfisa electronic organ in medium size church!
Anonymous
Sat 20-Oct-2018 02:30
This is wonderful, but it seems like a missed opportunity to use some kind of adaptive just temperament to make the intervals more pleasing. It seems to me that the pure tones here really bring out the weaknesses of equal temperament.
Anonymous
Thu 23-Jan-2020 17:35
Can't wait to see this performed live!

I heard Bach in Venice Italy in a small church using their church organ. Context really matters and was an awesome auditory and body experience experience from the reverberations.
Stein
Mon 27-Jan-2020 13:16
Wow! I just came across this. I had the same revelations back when I first got a guitar amplifier and tried running the C64 audio through it with reverb turned to max. I only did about a minute and a half of the Toccata in D minor because I couldn't do justice to the chords with only 3 SID voices. I had to go by ear since I couldn't read sheet music back then and I got some of the faster passages wrong. Although I grew up with Karl Richter's version I came to prefer Peter Hurford later, so my SID interpretation was based on that.

But as usual, you take it to the next level. This is awesome, thank you!